|
|
The following question was asked in a usenet news group, and what follows is my answer.
Question (about calipers): Anyone get the sense that they
burn thru batteries like wildfire? Mitutoyo's seem to last 1/2 of
ferever, but these goddamm cheapies... Which is surprising, cuz they
have an auto-off feature, that my Mits don't have!!
Answer (Philip): OOOhhh, OOOhhh, OOOhhh,
(visual: me at the back of the class room, jumping up and down
because at long last there is a question I know the answer to :-)
So it turns out that for the last 3 months, almost all my free
time has been spent studying the power consumption characteristics
of electronic calipers and micrometers.
First off, here is a surprise for you. Many calipers
continue to operate even when the display is off. Calipers
that do this can be recognized as follows: Set the jaws to
anything other than closed, and you read the normal
measurement. Turn the caliper off. Turn it back on. If it
still reads the same value, then only the display was
turned off. If it doesn't read the correct value, and
needs to be reset every time you turn it on, then it
really was off (but may still use some power in the off
state). I don't like calipers that forget zero.
On a side note, I have a 1" micrometer that forgets the
0.0000 position, and has to be closed and reset every time
it is turned on. Mix that in with an auto-off function,
and you will really hate it when you were measuring
something 0.75123" and you put it down on the desk, and it
turns off. Next time you need it you have to wind it all
the way closed to reset the zero position. Really hate it
if I am measuring another 0.75xxx part. When shopping for
digital measurement tools, check whether it remembers zero
across being turned off and back on.
For those calipers that do remember the zero position,
they also keep doing measurements, even if the display is
blank. For the Chinese calipers, they typically draw the
same power as when they are on. The Mitutoyo draws about
half as much power as when it is on. Don't believe me???
Try this: Turn on your Chinese caliper, close the jaws,
press the zero button, open it to 2 inches, turn it off,
press the zero button, move it to 3 inches and turn it
back on.
It was making measurements, and taking notice of the zero button
while it was "off". Actally, all it was doing was disabling the
display, which does not save any significant power. Even the SPC
output is active when it is "off".
The Mitutoyo caliper draws about 1/4 the power of the chinese
caliper when on, and about 1/8 the power when off.
> ... bunch of question about battery numbers ...
The two common cells for calipers are the LR44 and the SR44.
Calipers are usually shipped with the cheaper LR44.
LR44 is a Zinc + Manganese Dioxide chemistry SR44 is a Zinc +
Silver Oxide chemistry
LR44 starting voltage is about 1.500 Volts SR44 starting
voltage is about 1.550 Volts
Both are rated as 150 mA hours, but the discharge curves give
very different operational life depending on the required voltage
for the application. The LR44 voltage drops over the duration of
usage. The SR44 remains flat (and above 1.5V) for most of its useful
life, and then drops sharply at the end of life. The calipers need
at least 1.25 to operate.
The LR44 drops below 1.3 Volts after about 50% usage The SR44
drops below 1.5 Volts after about 95% usage.
So you only get about 50% of the 150 mA hours from an LR44.
The SR44 start at a slightly higher voltage, and their flat
discharge curve makes them far superior for low power, long
operational life applications, like a caliper.
>Jes tryna get more g-d bang fer my miserable buck.
Pick a Mitutoyo caliper, and run it with SR44 :-) You get what
you pay for.
>Oh, oh, speaking of bang and bucks, I'm in 7th heaven:
>*Finally* found these buttons at yer "better" 99c stores!!
>Along w/ *16 packs* of AA and AAAs--yeah, 99c--plus NYC
.0825. >Only thing is, you gotta scrape off the contacts on a
wire wheel. No >foolin--they say so on the package.
All of these el-cheapo batteries come from manufacturers you have
never heard of ("sun-moon batteries", "rising star batteries", ...)
and although they say they are replacements for SR44 and LR44, they
are poor quality LR44 chemistry.
>You can get the button cells for about 50c ea, mebbe less, in
q's of 20-100, >on the web.
The good news is that since you will be changing batteries often,
you will get to use them all.
Here is the data I collected.
properly ==========================================
All measurements are in microamps
Off On
Mitutoyo 500-171 2.0 4.0
Chinese Vendor 1 17.5 18.0
Chinese Vendor 2 17.5 18.5
Chinese Vendor 3 7.0 7.5
Chinese Vendor 4, #1 15.5 16.0
Chinese Vendor 4, #2 18.0 18.0
Chinese Vendor 4, #3 19.0 19.0
Chinese Vendor 4, #4 17.0 18.0
Chinese Vendor 4, #5 19.5 19.5
Chinese Vendor 4, #6 17.5 18.0
Chinese Vendor 4, #7 19.5 19.5
Chinese Vendor 4, #8 17.5 18.5
Chinese Vendor 4, #9 17.5 18.5
Chinese Vendor 4, #10 19.5 20.0
==========================================
Using an SR44:
So, for a Mitutoyo that is on for 1 hour per day the calculation
is: (1 hour * 4uA) + (23 hours * 2uA) = 50uAHours per day
SR44 (150 mA Hour) * 90% = 135mA Hours = 135000uA Hours
Battery life is therefore 135000/50 = 2700 days = 7.39
years. The self discharge of the battery will probably make it
half this duration.
Here it is for the Chinese calipers
(1 hour * 18uA) + (23 hours * 17.5uA) = 420.5uA Hours per day
SR44 (150 mA Hour) * 90% = 135mA Hours = 135000uA Hours
Battery life is therefore 135000/420.5 = 321 days = .87
years. The self discharge of the battery will probably not be
significant
You can do the math your self for the LR44 batteries. Remember to
use 50% rather than 90%.
For sale: 10 chinese calipers (vendor 4), $25 each + S&H .
Comes with a LR44 battery.
Philip Freidin
Question: What do you think of Steve's reference to the
zinc-air battery, and it's whopping ma-hrs? I wonder what the $$ is
for that.
http://data.energizer.com/
check out the specs on the ac675 (zinc air) vs. the standard 357
(silver oxide miniature) which most calipers take.
Answer: Looks great at first, but reality is not so
gentle.
The LR44 and SR44 are both rated as 150mA Hour, ac675 is the same
package but has the very impressive 635mA Hour rating. If it costs
less than 4 times as much you may think this is a great deal. Not
so. You need to read the "Zinc Air Application Manual" at the above
URL carefully. Here's where you get bitten twice:
- The nominal voltage is 1.4V which is insufficient head
room for a caliper. In my first email I said that "The calipers
need at least 1.25V to operate." . I have at least a few that just
sit there blinking at 1.38V If you look at the second page of the
Zinc/air manual you will see the discharge curve shows the voltage
is below 1.3V for almost all of its life. I would guess that the
reality is somewhere between 1.2V and 1.4V, but may change batch to
batch, and is almost certainly load dependent.
- The major bite though is this paragraph on the next page:
"The activated (tab off) air cell batteries have an expected
fresh capacity maintenance, depending on cell size, of 50% after
3-12 weeks at 20oC (68oF). Beyond 20 weeks, at 20oC (68oF), fresh
capacity maintenance drops to 0-10%. It is therefore very
important to keep the tab seal in place until usage."
So these cells have a really crappy life after you take the tab
off. This is OK for the hearing aid market where currents are
several hundred microamps up to a few milliamps, and you expect to
change the battery every few weeks. Not so good if you have a
Chinese caliper drawing 18uA, and a real bad choice for the
Mitutoyo calipers. Question: Also, I grok the
diff chems between LR and SR44's. But how do all these *other*
numbers fit in? 357, 357A, 386, seemingly hundreds of numbers for
this size button cell. Can they be either silver or manganese based?
Answer: This I am less sure about. Here is my
understanding:
- There are many chemistries, beyond the LR44 and SR44. How many
are available in this package I don't know, but you could just go
through all the chemistries at the above URL, and see if there is
a 11.6 mm diameter and 5.4 mm high part. I found 4, Manganese
Dioxide/Zinc, Silver Oxide/zinc, Zinc/air, and mercury.
- Each manufacturer uses their own number system for different
chemistries and package size, and for different grades (life or
mAHour) within the same chemistry and package combination. There
are standard names from ANSI and IEC which most manufacturers will
cross reference their part numbers to. It is common in the
electronic industry that if you specify that your product can
replace a competitors product, your product must be equal or better
in specifications, and must be a drop in replacement (mechanical
and electrical).
For example, the SR44 has the following names from the
following vendors:
Renata 303 UCAR 303 Energizer 303 Energizer 357
Eveready 303 Maxell SR44SW Panasonic SR44SW Sony
SR44SW Toshiba SR44SW Varta V303 Rayovac 303 Timex
A Citizen 280-08 Seiko SB-A9 I.E.C. SR44 I.E.C.
SR1154
All of these at a minimum have silver oxide chemistry, and are
11.6 mm diameter and 5.4 mm high
Energizer lists the following as cells that their 357 can
replace: 303, A76, AG13, EPX76, LR1154, LR44, SR44SW, and SR44W
Notice that LR44 (Manganese Dioxide chemistry) is on the list.
What this says is that they believe that in all respects the 357
(SR44) can be used to replace any manufacturers LR44 cell.
Hopefully they do not claim on their A76 (Energizer's LR44
product) that it is a suitable replacement for the SR44, as my
previous first post showed that that is not the case.
So just because one vendor says that a product can replace
another does not mean that the converse is true.
- While packages may look identical, it is clear that the
internal chemistry can radically affect the voltage, discharge
curve, and usage life. See the above exposé on the ac675 versus
the SR44
- When equipment manufacturers recommend a specific cell
(Mitutoyo recommends SR44), there is a good chance that they know
what they are saying. It may well mean that the device was
designed to specifically make best use of the battery's
characteristics.
- When a known vendor says their cell is a replacement for xxxx,
I tend to trust them. If I am designing equipment that is going to
be battery operated, I will download the data sheets for 4 or more
vendors of the battery class I am planning to use. I then do a
spec for spec compare of EVERY characteristic of the cells. I will
find diffences. I then create a master spec that is the lowest (or
highest, as appropriate) value for each spec. I then design to
this, knowing that any of the cells will work. For example,
operating temp:
Vendor Min temp Max temp
1 -30 +80
2 -40 +75
3 -20 +125
My spec: -20 +75
Question: I'm wondering if you did any accuracy and
repeatability checks on all of those calipers. If so, what were the
results?
Answer: Sure I did.
All calipers, and one micrometer were all compared against a
1.00000 that was supplied with my 2" Mitutoyo micrometer. PN 167-141
Mitutoyo 293-761-30 1.00005
Mitutoyo 500-171 1.0000
Chinese Vendor 1 0.9995
Chinese Vendor 2 0.9990
Chinese Vendor 3 1.0010
Chinese Vendor 4, #1 0.9995
Chinese Vendor 4, #2 0.9995
Chinese Vendor 4, #3 0.9995
Chinese Vendor 4, #4 1.0000
Chinese Vendor 4, #5 0.9995
Chinese Vendor 4, #6 0.9995
Chinese Vendor 4, #7 0.9995
Chinese Vendor 4, #8 1.0000
Chinese Vendor 4, #9 1.0000
Chinese Vendor 4, #10 0.9995
All measurements were made 3 times, and were repeatable (mostly
spot on, a few were +/- .0005. Since the display is digital, and the
last digit can only be 0 or 5 ( x .0001) , this is not considered an
error because when digital systems resolve an analog signal, they
discrete-ize the value. Since the analog value (a continuous
function) could be right at the point where the least significant
digit changes, the change in displayed value could be the result of
a change much smaller than the delta of the two displayed values.)
All the calipers have a resolution of .0005"
From the data I would say that the accuracy is .001"
Because of the way the calipers make their measurement, the
single value that I measured is of no use in estimating what the
reading would be at 2" or 5.333" etc. The resolution is .0005" over
the full travel, but the accuracy can be no better than .001" , and
may be worse. Accuracy errors may not be accumulative. i.e. if
1.0000 read 1.0010, and 2.0000 read 2.0010, you would be incorrect to
assume that 3.0000 would read 3.0010
There is insufficient data above to say whether a 6" Mitutoyo
caliper is more accurate that the Chinese ones, plus the measurement
depends on the pressure used in closing the caliper on the standard.
Typically the caliper is closed with the little thumb roll wheel. If
excessive pressure is used, a low reading results.
I find I get more consistent results by closing the caliper on
the work piece by pressing on the outside of the jaws inline with
the work piece measurement axis.
|